Guys get ranked in the top 100 all the time with so so fundamentals and basketball skills because in HS their tremendous athleticism allows them to run past and jump over all in their way. Then they get to college and hopefully they get to gradually grow in Division 1 players. Some do this quickly and some, yes even some to 100 (read lots) players don't really start having any significant impact until they are upperclassmen.
If the guys on this team were each given the correct learning curve they'd be gelling and playing together as an above average BE squad in 13/14. From what I've seen only DLo, Mo H, and Chris O came to the program as the types of players that can make an impact right away but that doesn't mean the rest of them don't have the potential to do so down the road. I hope that they still are an above average BE squad next year but I also feel that having so many guys thrown straight into the fire hasn't been good for some of them and hopefully hasn't stunted any of their development.
I think that's a fair assessment. I'd add to it something that other posters have pointed out in the past: that it certainly hasn't helped them to have no upperclassmen to usher them along. Even guys who aren't stars on the court, but who've been in the program for 3 or 4 years, can show you how a drill is supposed to be run, tell you what to expect at certain road games, or show by example the time they put in in the weight room or watching film.
I hate the youngest team label as much as anyone, but these things are true. It helps to have upperclassmen to show you what's expected of you. How can there be any mentoring on a team where even the most experienced guys have only done it once before?