It looks as though our team is made up of two distinct elements this year: (1) an experienced backcourt that ought to provide the majority of the points we score; and (2) a group of post players who aren't likely to demand the ball and who have the size to clear space, grab rebounds, and clean up the garbage.
That is a clear change from the past few seasons, where there has been some tension about ball distribution between the guards and a frontcourt star. By tension I don't mean friction, only that there is only one ball to go around, and it has never seemed to me that Lavin's teams had a plan they were comfortable with about who gets the ball where and when to take a shot.
I think that this year's group has components that could be blended into a real team, one in which everybody has a role and knows what it is. That sort of clarity helps players play together on offense and defense, and gets you to a place where the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.
If we can do that, then I think we can have a very nice season.
I also think that just about 100% of the responsibility for that rests with the coach. There's no more "we're the youngest team in the country," no more "we're learning to play together," no more "we lost this guy to the NBA after one year," etc. It's the coach's job to take this group, find roles for them (which really shouldn't be that hard given the cast of characters), give them a plan, manage the personalities, create a team character, and put them in a position to succeed.
Moreover, those decisions should be made very early in the year, instead of experimenting until mid-December before settling on a plan.
That is a clear change from the past few seasons, where there has been some tension about ball distribution between the guards and a frontcourt star. By tension I don't mean friction, only that there is only one ball to go around, and it has never seemed to me that Lavin's teams had a plan they were comfortable with about who gets the ball where and when to take a shot.
I think that this year's group has components that could be blended into a real team, one in which everybody has a role and knows what it is. That sort of clarity helps players play together on offense and defense, and gets you to a place where the whole is greater than the sum of the parts.
If we can do that, then I think we can have a very nice season.
I also think that just about 100% of the responsibility for that rests with the coach. There's no more "we're the youngest team in the country," no more "we're learning to play together," no more "we lost this guy to the NBA after one year," etc. It's the coach's job to take this group, find roles for them (which really shouldn't be that hard given the cast of characters), give them a plan, manage the personalities, create a team character, and put them in a position to succeed.
Moreover, those decisions should be made very early in the year, instead of experimenting until mid-December before settling on a plan.