(GAME TIME) @#16 / #14 Seton Hall, Sun. Feb. 23, 2pm, CBS / 570 WMCA

Status
Not open for further replies.
[quote="Knight" post=378425]Out coached because SH continues make the same plays repeatedly with no adjustments. We just used our 2nd TO with less than 6 minutes to play.[/quote]

Once Seton Hall get some dribble-drive going, then you're susceptible to the lob. Particularly against someone the size of Gill. We're either out of position to prevent it or they simply toss it high enough to where no one can get it other than Gill.
 
[quote="Knight" post=378425]Out coached because SH continues make the same plays repeatedly with no adjustments. We just used our 2nd TO with less than 6 minutes to play.[/quote]

We must be watching two different games. Shame that you’ve given up on Anderson when his first year hasn’t even concluded yet.
 
[quote="MJDinkins" post=378427]They allowed Mamu big, goofy looking ass go coast-to-coast. LJ with a half-ass reach in for a steal.[/quote]

That’s Willard outcoaching Anderson.
 
This team isnt winning another regular season game this year. Nova is going to kill us wednesday night. Creighton wont be much better.
 
[quote="MJDinkins" post=378430][quote="Knight" post=378425]Out coached because SH continues make the same plays repeatedly with no adjustments. We just used our 2nd TO with less than 6 minutes to play.[/quote]

Once Seton Hall get some dribble-drive going, then you're susceptible to the lob. Particularly against someone the size of Gill. We're either out of position to prevent it or they simply toss it high enough to where no one can get it other than Gill.[/quote]

This is possibly one of seton hall’s best teams ever with a good Pg, one of the best scorers in the nation and more than one dominant big guy. We have none of those things. Coaching can’t solve it all. Games are still played by the players. Get Mr. Anderson some real talent before making these types of generalizations about a 400-win coach.
 
Last edited:
[quote="Tonyinfairfield " post=378431][quote="Knight" post=378425]Out coached because SH continues make the same plays repeatedly with no adjustments. We just used our 2nd TO with less than 6 minutes to play.[/quote]

We must be watching two different games. Shame that you’ve given up on Anderson when his first year hasn’t even concluded yet.[/quote]

Shame on you for concluding I've given up on CMA. He's had a poor game coaching in my opinion. I'm 100% behind CMA. But he's not perfect.
 
[quote="Duke of Earlington" post=378434]This team isnt winning another regular season game this year. Nova is going to kill us wednesday night. Creighton wont be much better.[/quote]

You really went out on limb, eh?
 
[quote="bamafan" post=378432]Is Willaims allergic to shooting or scoring?[/quote]

He's very tentative. I've noticed if he hits a shot early, then he isn't as tentative. Once he misses a couple of shots, then he becomes quite tentative.
 
Upward and onward. Hard to see us winning another one this year unless we knock off Marquette at the Garden.
Next year should be better. One can only hope for the best.
 
[quote="MCNPA" post=378435][quote="MJDinkins" post=378430][quote="Knight" post=378425]Out coached because SH continues make the same plays repeatedly with no adjustments. We just used our 2nd TO with less than 6 minutes to play.[/quote]

Once Seton Hall get some dribble-drive going, then you're susceptible to the lob. Particularly against someone the size of Gill. We're either out of position to prevent it or they simply toss it high enough to where no one can get it other than Gill.[/quote]

This is possibly one of seton hall’s best teams ever with a good Pg, one of the best scorers in the nation and more than one dominant big guy. We have none of those things. Coaching can’t solve it all. Games are still played by the players.[/quote]

Yep, coaching can't it all. We've seen we can play with basically the entire conference, but we can't sufficiently close.
 
[quote="NCJohnnie" post=378439]Upward and onward. Hard to see us winning another one this year unless we knock off Marquette at the Garden.
Next year should be better. One can only hope for the best.[/quote]

Honestly, I think we'll beat Marquette. I'm not exactly impressed with 'em. We'll play Creighton tough being the game is in the "band-box." Not sure if we can pull it off, though.
 
I don’t know about DePaul fans but , being perennial BE doormats has been a long and disheartening experience . I know Anderson has done all he could with the Players he has ... I hope he can bring in several more Players , in addition to those already committed for next year . In this League , you need your Core 8 players to be BE Talent as soon as they put on the uniform . They need to be able to shoot 3’s and not just 1 player on the roster . If you can’t shoot the Ball well in the BE , you cannot compete . No matter what kind of defense you present . We just don’t seem to be a destination for the higher rated HS players and until that changes , our doldrums might continue . While it was good fortune for us to pick up Coach Anderson , the reality was our first 4 Choices turned us down . I guess 20 years of bad basketball will do that . It’s a long time to be bad . And , has nothing to do with not supporting the School or being a Alum .
 
[quote="SLYFOXX1968" post=378444]I don’t know about DePaul fans but , being perennial BE doormats has been a long and disheartening experience . I know Anderson has done all he could with the Players he has ... I hope he can bring in several more Players , in addition to those already committed for next year . In this League , you need your Core 8 players to be BE Talent as soon as they put on the uniform . They need to be able to shoot 3’s and not just 1 player on the roster . If you can’t shoot the Ball well in the BE , you cannot compete . No matter what kind of defense you present . We just don’t seem to be a destination for the higher rated HS players and until that changes , our doldrums might continue . While it was good fortune for us to pick up Coach Anderson , the reality was our first 4 Choices turned us down . I guess 20 years of bad basketball will do that . It’s a long time to be bad . And , has nothing to do with not supporting the School or being a Alum .[/quote]

Which first four choices turned us down? I only recall Hurley and Moser. Who's the other two?
 
[quote="Knight" post=378436][quote="Tonyinfairfield " post=378431][quote="Knight" post=378425]Out coached because SH continues make the same plays repeatedly with no adjustments. We just used our 2nd TO with less than 6 minutes to play.[/quote]

We must be watching two different games. Shame that you’ve given up on Anderson when his first year hasn’t even concluded yet.[/quote]

Shame on you for concluding I've given up on CMA. He's had a poor game coaching in my opinion. I'm 100% behind CMA. But he's not perfect.[/quote]

You’re constant mantra that we’re being outcoached does make it appear that you have given up on him. And it doesn’t sound like someone who’s 100% behind a coach. I agree that he’s not perfect; no coach is. But he is less than one year into his tenure without having a full recruiting class. If he doesn’t recruit well and doesn’t turn this program around by year three, then I will be the most critical of him. But to say he was outcoached in today’s game, with the clear disparity in talent, is simply incorrect.
 
[quote="MJDinkins" post=378445][quote="SLYFOXX1968" post=378444]I don’t know about DePaul fans but , being perennial BE doormats has been a long and disheartening experience . I know Anderson has done all he could with the Players he has ... I hope he can bring in several more Players , in addition to those already committed for next year . In this League , you need your Core 8 players to be BE Talent as soon as they put on the uniform . They need to be able to shoot 3’s and not just 1 player on the roster . If you can’t shoot the Ball well in the BE , you cannot compete . No matter what kind of defense you present . We just don’t seem to be a destination for the higher rated HS players and until that changes , our doldrums might continue . While it was good fortune for us to pick up Coach Anderson , the reality was our first 4 Choices turned us down . I guess 20 years of bad basketball will do that . It’s a long time to be bad . And , has nothing to do with not supporting the School or being a Alum .[/quote]

Which first four choices turned us down? I only recall Hurley and Moser. Who's the other two?[/quote]
Some people count Odom and Cleuss.
 
[quote="bamafan" post=378447][quote="MJDinkins" post=378445][quote="SLYFOXX1968" post=378444]I don’t know about DePaul fans but , being perennial BE doormats has been a long and disheartening experience . I know Anderson has done all he could with the Players he has ... I hope he can bring in several more Players , in addition to those already committed for next year . In this League , you need your Core 8 players to be BE Talent as soon as they put on the uniform . They need to be able to shoot 3’s and not just 1 player on the roster . If you can’t shoot the Ball well in the BE , you cannot compete . No matter what kind of defense you present . We just don’t seem to be a destination for the higher rated HS players and until that changes , our doldrums might continue . While it was good fortune for us to pick up Coach Anderson , the reality was our first 4 Choices turned us down . I guess 20 years of bad basketball will do that . It’s a long time to be bad . And , has nothing to do with not supporting the School or being a Alum .[/quote]

Which first four choices turned us down? I only recall Hurley and Moser. Who's the other two?[/quote]
Some people count Odom and Cleuss.[/quote]

Definitely Odom
 
[quote="Boo Harvey" post=378448][quote="bamafan" post=378447][quote="MJDinkins" post=378445][quote="SLYFOXX1968" post=378444]I don’t know about DePaul fans but , being perennial BE doormats has been a long and disheartening experience . I know Anderson has done all he could with the Players he has ... I hope he can bring in several more Players , in addition to those already committed for next year . In this League , you need your Core 8 players to be BE Talent as soon as they put on the uniform . They need to be able to shoot 3’s and not just 1 player on the roster . If you can’t shoot the Ball well in the BE , you cannot compete . No matter what kind of defense you present . We just don’t seem to be a destination for the higher rated HS players and until that changes , our doldrums might continue . While it was good fortune for us to pick up Coach Anderson , the reality was our first 4 Choices turned us down . I guess 20 years of bad basketball will do that . It’s a long time to be bad . And , has nothing to do with not supporting the School or being a Alum .[/quote]

Which first four choices turned us down? I only recall Hurley and Moser. Who's the other two?[/quote]
Some people count Odom and Cleuss.[/quote]

Definitely Odom[/quote]

I don't recall Odom ever being officially offered. Cluess certainly wasn't offered.
 
Last edited:
[quote="Tonyinfairfield " post=378446][quote="Knight" post=378436][quote="Tonyinfairfield " post=378431][quote="Knight" post=378425]Out coached because SH continues make the same plays repeatedly with no adjustments. We just used our 2nd TO with less than 6 minutes to play.[/quote]

We must be watching two different games. Shame that you’ve given up on Anderson when his first year hasn’t even concluded yet.[/quote]

Shame on you for concluding I've given up on CMA. He's had a poor game coaching in my opinion. I'm 100% behind CMA. But he's not perfect.[/quote]

You’re constant mantra that we’re being outcoached does make it appear that you have given up on him. And it doesn’t sound like someone who’s 100% behind a coach. I agree that he’s not perfect; no coach is. But he is less than one year into his tenure without having a full recruiting class. If he doesn’t recruit well and doesn’t turn this program around by year three, then I will be the most critical of him. But to say he was outcoached in today’s game, with the clear disparity in talent, is simply incorrect.[/quote]

Constant mantra? What were you an English major?
You may need to Up your meds.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top