FSU, Clemson and ACC Settlment

SJU85

Well-known member
2023 $upporter 2022 $upporter

From the article:

What happens if enough ACC football programs want to join a super league?

Under the settlement, the cost to leave in the 2025-26 fiscal year is $165 million and drops by $18 million annually. The figure stays at $75 million from 2030-31 through 2036 (the final year of the contract).

Crucially, departing schools keep their future TV rights. If those rights had remained with the ACC, Clemson or Florida State would have added significantly less value to a new conference, such as the SEC or Big Ten.
The notable change is with revenue from the league’s multimedia contracts. The first 40 percent of that money from sources will be split evenly among the schools. Of the remaining 60 percent, three-quarters will be distributed based on football TV viewership, and one-quarter will be based on men’s basketball viewership. Other details were redacted and claimed as trade secrets.

What about a super league?​

Officially called an “option of limited withdrawal,” it’s the juiciest part of the agreement and new information, regardless of whether it’s feasible.

Suppose at least six members want to leave the same sport to join a “single sport league, conference or other association” alongside other schools. In that case, they’ll owe $75 million or 50 percent of the current withdrawal figure (whichever is greater). In practice, that would allow, say, Florida State, Clemson, Miami, North Carolina and a few other top programs to leave for a super league in football while remaining ACC members in basketball, baseball and every other sport.
 

From the article:

What happens if enough ACC football programs want to join a super league?

Under the settlement, the cost to leave in the 2025-26 fiscal year is $165 million and drops by $18 million annually. The figure stays at $75 million from 2030-31 through 2036 (the final year of the contract).

Crucially, departing schools keep their future TV rights. If those rights had remained with the ACC, Clemson or Florida State would have added significantly less value to a new conference, such as the SEC or Big Ten.
The notable change is with revenue from the league’s multimedia contracts. The first 40 percent of that money from sources will be split evenly among the schools. Of the remaining 60 percent, three-quarters will be distributed based on football TV viewership, and one-quarter will be based on men’s basketball viewership. Other details were redacted and claimed as trade secrets.

What about a super league?​

Officially called an “option of limited withdrawal,” it’s the juiciest part of the agreement and new information, regardless of whether it’s feasible.

Suppose at least six members want to leave the same sport to join a “single sport league, conference or other association” alongside other schools. In that case, they’ll owe $75 million or 50 percent of the current withdrawal figure (whichever is greater). In practice, that would allow, say, Florida State, Clemson, Miami, North Carolina and a few other top programs to leave for a super league in football while remaining ACC members in basketball, baseball and every other sport.
Can’t see any league taking 6 of them other than the Big 12. The drop off from FSU and Clemson is a big one.
 
Can’t see any league taking 6 of them other than the Big 12. The drop off from FSU and Clemson is a big one.
The Big 12 would take 6 ACC teams, but the Big 12 pays out almost the same as the ACC. Not sure why 6 ACC teams pay $75MM to make that jump.

Not sure how adding FSU or Clemson to the SEC or Big 10 helps either league financially. Big 10/SEC was estimated to pay out $75MM can't see Clemson or FSU bringing that kind of value. If they were to be invited they surely would be on the UCLA/Washington plan of fractional payout for the foreseeable future. Surprised ACC didn't play a little hardball.

College football went to hell in a handbasket the minute UT announced it was leaving the Big 12.
 
Back
Top