Wow. Good thing for the coaches and Cragg that they are not paid per win. Clearly no expectations around SJU sports anymoreAJ Hidell post=464233 said:IDRAFT post=464123 said:He has been here four years now. Nothing gets built, nothing gets funded, and the attendance at basketball games decreases annually. He pushed out the last coach with no plan on a new coach, which led to weeks of embarrassment for the University. And as the AD he has also helped destroy the Lacrosse and Baseball programs.
People say he is a hard worker. The athletic department did a good job at one thing in four years, they got more students to games this year. What else? What am I missing about this guy?
After reading the above post got me looking into how our spring sports are doing after our disastrous winter sports:
As of today the combined record of Lacrosse (1-5) Baseball (2-13) and Softball (3-16) are 6-34!!! What has happened to our storied baseball program? Team is getting blown out in many games and just dropped 2 of 3 to MANHATTAN. Softball traditionally makes the Big East Tourney and they are usually competitive but are also getting blown out most games. Even Fencing is having its worst season in years with probably the least amount of fencers getting an NCAA invite. I don’t think we can place any blame on our AD…but something must be up with these results and W Hoops going 12-19 to go along with our 17-15 season looks bad. Are our coaches being held accountable for these poor on field performances by our Senior Athletic Staff?
If the Big East still had the Commissioner's Trophy , emblematic of the best program in the conference, we might very well be in last place in the standings this year.
this is usually the point that I’ll take this off topic to avoid the shite show but wouldn’t want anyone complaining about being off topicOhioFan post=464251 said:The premise of this thread and a vast majority of the posts are just nuts. I will not say any more.
Thank you I think that's a very fair list.RedStormNC post=464343 said:I'll take a shot
He's re-organized the dept and staff assignments, leader roles
He did a facilities survey to support the broader university master plan
He outsourced marketiing type stuff to Learfield IMG
He got the NIL thing going for students
Maybe others that are bigger...don't know
I'm not saying he's hit a home run, but he's been better than anyone else in a while
He probably bleeds blue more than red but as long as he can make tough decisions, build culture and push for more university resources he's doing OK so far.
Nope. Your post was implicitly negative. And the timing of it is completely unnecessary.IDRAFT post=464337 said:I started a thread to ask what he has done that is positive. I didn't ask for a loyalty oath to the cult of Cragg - which seems very large here. Nobody is listing anything that the guy has done, just mocking the question, and with the stupid Paultzman thread, mocking the thread itself.
As a consumer of SJU basketball I thought it was a fair topic four years into his run here. This is supposed to be a place to discuss SJU sports ad he is the AD. But whatever.
Of course, it was negative. And I listed reasons I'm down on the guy. I also pointed out a positive that he did accomplish. I didn't just write "Cragg Sucks." Why right now, in the offseason, it is not okay to discuss the AD on a SJU message board is something I would never have imagined, but I learn something new every day, I guess.SJ_NYC post=464345 said:Nope. Your post was implicitly negative. And the timing of it is completely unnecessary.IDRAFT post=464337 said:I started a thread to ask what he has done that is positive. I didn't ask for a loyalty oath to the cult of Cragg - which seems very large here. Nobody is listing anything that the guy has done, just mocking the question, and with the stupid Paultzman thread, mocking the thread itself.
As a consumer of SJU basketball I thought it was a fair topic four years into his run here. This is supposed to be a place to discuss SJU sports ad he is the AD. But whatever.
IDRAFT post=464337 said:I started a thread to ask what he has done that is positive. I didn't ask for a loyalty oath to the cult of Cragg - which seems very large here. Nobody is listing anything that the guy has done, just mocking the question, and with the stupid Paultzman thread, mocking the thread itself.
As a consumer of SJU basketball I thought it was a fair topic four years into his run here. This is supposed to be a place to discuss SJU sports ad he is the AD. But whatever.
Very fair and reasonable thread and subject matter IDRAFT. Absolutely nothing wrong with questioning conventional wisdom and groupthink. OfIDRAFT post=464358 said:Of course, it was negative. And I listed reasons I'm down on the guy. I also pointed out a positive that he did accomplish. I didn't just write "Cragg Sucks." Why right now, in the offseason, it is not okay to discuss the AD on a SJU message board is something I would never have imagined, but I learn something new every day, I guess.SJ_NYC post=464345 said:Nope. Your post was implicitly negative. And the timing of it is completely unnecessary.IDRAFT post=464337 said:I started a thread to ask what he has done that is positive. I didn't ask for a loyalty oath to the cult of Cragg - which seems very large here. Nobody is listing anything that the guy has done, just mocking the question, and with the stupid Paultzman thread, mocking the thread itself.
As a consumer of SJU basketball I thought it was a fair topic four years into his run here. This is supposed to be a place to discuss SJU sports ad he is the AD. But whatever.
I probably write 20 positive posts to every negative one I write on this forum. And when I write a negative one a moderator (a moderator!) opens up an entire thread to mock my post. What a group here.
No worries I got the message, Cragg is out of bounds in these parts.
I'm done on this topic, if anyone else wants to chime in I promise I will not be responding.