redmannorth" post=424613 said:We have much less talent than Uconn, the talent level between the 2 schools is not comparable.Monte" post=424611 said:Succesful teams are a combination of talent and coaching(I'm simplifying it). UCONN finished 3rd and we finished 4th. So the disparity between the 2 teams, in terms of results this season, is relatively minor. My feeling is that we have slightly less talent overall, and slightly better coaching. Some of you may disagree.
Their talent played to their level our talent greatly exceeded the level of talent on paper and played well collectively which made the sum greater than the individual parts. Excellent job by CMA and staff and kudos to the players who bought in to the system.
redmannorth" post=424613 said:We have much less talent than Uconn, the talent level between the 2 schools is not comparable.Monte" post=424611 said:Succesful teams are a combination of talent and coaching(I'm simplifying it). UCONN finished 3rd and we finished 4th. So the disparity between the 2 teams, in terms of results this season, is relatively minor. My feeling is that we have slightly less talent overall, and slightly better coaching. Some of you may disagree.
Their talent played to their level our talent greatly exceeded the level of talent on paper and played well collectively which made the sum greater than the individual parts. Excellent job by CMA and staff and kudos to the players who bought in to the system.
So I guess RMN, that would make you one of the people who disagree with me? lol. I'll tell you this much, I'll venture a guess that SH, PC and a lot of the other teams that we beat up on this year don't question our team's talent level. Again, I give CMA(and the kids) all the credit in the world for maximizing their talents. The one thing we're lacking that it seems all other Big East teams have, is a solid low post presence. Hopefully soon.
lawmanfan" post=424617 said:redmannorth" post=424613 said:We have much less talent than Uconn, the talent level between the 2 schools is not comparable.Monte" post=424611 said:Succesful teams are a combination of talent and coaching(I'm simplifying it). UCONN finished 3rd and we finished 4th. So the disparity between the 2 teams, in terms of results this season, is relatively minor. My feeling is that we have slightly less talent overall, and slightly better coaching. Some of you may disagree.
Their talent played to their level our talent greatly exceeded the level of talent on paper and played well collectively which made the sum greater than the individual parts. Excellent job by CMA and staff and kudos to the players who bought in to the system.
I'm with North on this. Look at it this way:
Bouknight > Champagnie
Posh > Cole
After that Polley, Whaley, Sanogo, Martin, Gaffney are all better than Dunn, Moore, Roberts, Earlington, Wusu.
UConn's roster can play you big, small, halfcourt, fullcourt, and beat you any of those ways. It's a good, deep, versatile roster. They have 7 players who are full-time caliber Big East starters. And they're well coached.
By comparison, Anderson has 2 full-time caliber Big East starters and he has put the rest together by using his entire bench and maximizing their skills and abilities. Just a far superior coaching job with a significantly shallower roster.
I've left Greg W out of the conversation due to injury, but even if you throw him into the discussion it doesn't change the equation IMHO.
But MM52 is correct - the coaches got it right so it's a moot issue.
That's some spin right there LMF; I was never arguing who should he coach of the year, so it was always moot by your rationale. I've watched a ton of UCONN this year, and I don't see the talent disparity being quite as great as some of you guys do. To each his own.