Around College Basketball 25-26

North Carolina is not in the mix for USC transfer Desmond Claude, sources tell @On3sports.
Was listening to a UNC podcast and available $ were cited as one of issues w/ why Stoykovich was never serious (excluding other reasons he may have chose elsewhere( . Sources were saying less than $1M was left in NIL budget this year. Apparently went heavy on others...Might be same reason Claude was not in mix.
 
Ole Miss is really a serious player in general. Beard gets it done.


I was actually thinking about them yesterday if Boogie returns.

I think they are willing to throw around crazy money for certain kids. And for the certain kids, if you planned on only doing one more year, could you deal with living in Mississippi for $3+ million?
 
MIAMI — A proposal from the power conferences stands to potentially remake the NCAA governance and championship structure, shifting more authority to the power leagues over rule-making, policy decisions and, even, postseason events.

The proposal, a collaboration of the four power leagues, would grant the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12 and ACC rights to manage postseason championships, such as the men’s and women’s basketball tournaments, assuming control over events that have long been operated by the national association.

The proposal is described only as a “working document” and is not a complete or approved product.

However, as the NCAA works to establish a new governance model to coincide with the landmark settlement of the House antitrust case, the document indicates a clear direction from the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12 and ACC. They want an expansion of their previously existing autonomous legislative powers, not only for rule-making and policy decision-making but for NCAA championships as well, controlling concepts like tournament format, revenue distribution and selection committee process.

 
MIAMI — A proposal from the power conferences stands to potentially remake the NCAA governance and championship structure, shifting more authority to the power leagues over rule-making, policy decisions and, even, postseason events.

The proposal, a collaboration of the four power leagues, would grant the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12 and ACC rights to manage postseason championships, such as the men’s and women’s basketball tournaments, assuming control over events that have long been operated by the national association.

The proposal is described only as a “working document” and is not a complete or approved product.

However, as the NCAA works to establish a new governance model to coincide with the landmark settlement of the House antitrust case, the document indicates a clear direction from the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12 and ACC. They want an expansion of their previously existing autonomous legislative powers, not only for rule-making and policy decision-making but for NCAA championships as well, controlling concepts like tournament format, revenue distribution and selection committee process.

And in an equally surprising announcement, the sun rose this morning.
 
MIAMI — A proposal from the power conferences stands to potentially remake the NCAA governance and championship structure, shifting more authority to the power leagues over rule-making, policy decisions and, even, postseason events.

The proposal, a collaboration of the four power leagues, would grant the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12 and ACC rights to manage postseason championships, such as the men’s and women’s basketball tournaments, assuming control over events that have long been operated by the national association.

The proposal is described only as a “working document” and is not a complete or approved product.

However, as the NCAA works to establish a new governance model to coincide with the landmark settlement of the House antitrust case, the document indicates a clear direction from the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12 and ACC. They want an expansion of their previously existing autonomous legislative powers, not only for rule-making and policy decision-making but for NCAA championships as well, controlling concepts like tournament format, revenue distribution and selection committee process.

This is just noise, nothing more. Even with expanded control (in whatever form that may be) those 4 conferences will NEVER be in full control of March Madness as an example. Babies crying over spilled milk.
 
This is just noise, nothing more. Even with expanded control (in whatever form that may be) those 4 conferences will NEVER be in full control of March Madness as an example. Babies crying over spilled milk.
Oh my.
 
Last edited:
This is just noise, nothing more. Even with expanded control (in whatever form that may be) those 4 conferences will NEVER be in full control of March Madness as an example. Babies crying over spilled milk.
Enough already from these so-called monopolistic power conferences.
Sue the shit out of them in a New York Court and sabotage their monopolistic grab for total control.
 
However, as the NCAA works to establish a new governance model to coincide with the landmark settlement of the House antitrust case, the document indicates a clear direction from the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12 and ACC. They want an expansion of their previously existing autonomous legislative powers, not only for rule-making and policy decision-making but for NCAA championships as well, controlling concepts like tournament format, revenue distribution and selection committee process.
 
Back
Top