Ray Morgan post=447978 said:
Monte post=447966 said:
Wait, what? Here's a list of top 100 kids who the last 3 coaches have brought in either directly or via transfer:
Norm:
Burrell
Lavin:
Polee
Harkless
Harrison
Greene
Garrett
Sir Dom
Sampson
Obekpa
Jordan
Branch
Mullin:
Ponds
Lovett
Simon
Heron
Plus we got countless other top 150 kids like Mason Jr, DJ, Ellison, etc. Plus JC AA's like Hardy, Brownlee, Primo, LJ, Ahmed. etc. And highly regarded foreign players like Mussini, Fruedenberg, etc. So I'm not quite sure where this notion came about that we can't get talent to come here, because it's simply not true.
A few points. My list was post Lavin. That was 3 coaches again and has no recency. I used the ESPN top 100. I did not include transfers from junior colleges or otherwise. Of course we can get talent. Top 150 will get you mid pack in your conference and a low seeding every 5 years or so. Like I asked Lawmanfan, if you can provide a successful program in a major conference that wins with players exclusively in the 100-200 range, then you will have my attention. If there is such a program, we need to follow their plan. Or figure out what's missing here and do what the top programs do: Get more 4 star players out of high school. They are more likely to be difference makers. I'm not sure why that seems to be hard to accept, although I have my theories.
I stand corrected Ray. I looked at the list quickly. I still think Mullin/Matt brought in ample talent, much better talent then we've seen CMA bring in. Not all right out of High School, but that's fine. Lots of schools in this new era are relying on transfers as well as high school kids. Mullin wasn't a coach, CMA is. I think if CMA had Mullin's last 2 year talent, the team would easily be dancing. And yes, it's pretty damn simple; get the players and success will follow. Don't get the players, and it won't. It's the school's job to figure out how to compete with other schools in the conference in terms of facilities, etc. FWIW I just read an article were Cragg said that attendance is up 33% over last season. So that's encouraging. Between that and some fundraising, which he and Shanley are supposed to be very good at, maybe there's hope.
Mullin had ample talent to succeed. Absolutely agree. Simon, LJ and Ponds were 4 stars, and Heron a 5 star. Right players and wrong coach. Good programs exhaust all resources. Nova added Paschall and he was an important part of their championship team. I wasn't thrilled with Matt's seemingly sole focus on transfers. I like CMA, and hope he succeeds. We were poised for a really nice season, and the transfer rules gave him and the whole program a gut punch. Still hoping that the Pitt loss was a wake up call and a character builder. Like the Niagara loss was in 1984.