Weekend Confidential / The Wall Street Journal / Expanding the Humanities

jerseyshorejohnny

Well-known member
WEEKEND CONFIDENTIAL / WALL STREET JOURNAL

Foundation Chief Andrew Delbanco Wants All Students to Wrestle With Great Books

The professor and author hopes to expand humanities offerings on campus, even for scientists and engineers

By Emily Bobrow

Dec. 18, 2020




Andrew Delbanco recalls teaching a class about Abraham Lincoln at Columbia University several years ago and having a student challenge his regard for the Gettysburg Address. The young Black woman wondered how he could expect her to share his respect for a Civil War speech that never mentioned slavery. “That’s a really hard question,” Mr. Delbanco says.

He recalls answering her by first noting that Lincoln’s contempt for slavery was implied by his call for “a new birth of freedom.” He then explained that Lincoln was trying to rally the public behind the war before an election against a rival who was pushing peace, and “slavery wasn’t top of mind” for most Northerners. But the moment highlighted important contrasts in the experience of American history in the classroom. “She was listening and I think learning through our conversation, but so was I,” says Mr. Delbanco, 68.

Mr. Delbanco, the Alexander Hamilton Professor of American Studies at Columbia, describes teaching as a moral activity. “I have this old-fashioned view that the classroom experience can actually give young people a better self-understanding and a greater awareness of the world around them,” he says. When students read great texts together, whether they are wrestling with the difference between love and desire in Shakespeare or considering Hannah Arendt’s analysis of totalitarianism, they ultimately learn how to think and listen to competing points of view. This makes them better able to function in a democracy, he says, “which, as we are often reminded of now, is a hard thing to do.”

Too many students leave college without these skills, Mr. Delbanco says. As the price of college rises and the job market contracts, young people are wary of pursuits that could delay paying off their debts. In search of marketable degrees, many are neglecting the humanities. To study philosophy or English literature in 2020 is basically conspicuous consumption.



Mr. Delbanco thinks that he has a solution. As president of the Teagle Foundation, which supports liberal-arts education, he is working to revive a humanities-based general education on college campuses across the country. Together with the National Endowment for the Humanities, the Teagle Foundation is sponsoring a $7 million grant program over five years to expand access to classroom experiences that reckon with the purpose of life.

The program is modeled after a successful experiment at Purdue University, where first-year students have discussed everything from Thucydides to James Baldwin in classes capped at 30 students. At least half the assignments come from a faculty-generated list of classics covering a range of eras and ideas ( Plato, Mary Shelley, Gabriel García Márquez, Toni Morrison ), which professors supplement with their own choices. What began as a small-scale pilot in the fall of 2017 now enrolls more than 2,000 students each semester, most of whom plan to pursue STEM fields. “Learning how to read critically, learning how to pay attention to meaning and ambiguities—these skills are transportable to every other sphere of life,” says Mr. Delbanco.

He hopes that the program will also reduce academic attrition. Around four in 10 students don’t graduate six years after starting their degree, according to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). Mr. Delbanco knows that college can be intimidating, especially for the growing number of students who are the first in their family to attend. Putting these students in a classroom of peers who are reading the same books and addressing the same questions, he thinks, will help “anchor them and make them feel like the institution cares.”

Mr. Delbanco has long criticized the way America’s higher-education system both reflects and exacerbates socioeconomic inequalities. Private nonprofit universities, where students tend to be relatively affluent, can spend more than $60,000 a year to teach, house, feed and support each attendee (and the wealthiest institutions spend nearly double that), while community colleges, which often serve mostly minority and first-generation students, spend up to $15,000 a student, according to the NCES. Mr. Delbanco says it is partly because community institutions have fewer resources to spend on financial aid and academic support that graduation rates are the same for low-income students with high test scores as for high-income students with low scores—“not the picture of a just society,” he notes.




Under Mr. Delbanco’s stewardship since 2018, the Teagle Foundation is particularly interested in helping less privileged students. It has supported colleges that invite underserved high-school students to spend several weeks in philosophy and literature seminars. (Early data from the first program at Columbia found that attendees were more likely to go to college.) The foundation is also joining with the Arthur Vining Davis Foundations to make it easier for students to transfer from two-year community colleges to four-year independent colleges.

“We don’t choose the families we were born to,” observes Mr. Delbanco. His own life, he adds, has been marked by good fortune. His Jewish parents (the Italian surname is Venetian Jewish) left Germany as Hitler rose to power, living first in the U.K. and then Westchester, N.Y., where they had Andrew, the youngest of three sons. After studying at the Ethical Culture Fieldston School in the Bronx, he went to Harvard, where he met his wife, Dawn Ho (they married days after graduation in 1973), and earned his Ph.D.




He was always curious, but his “intellectual awakening” came while studying under Alan Heimert, a scholar of early American literature and culture, with whom he collaborated on one book (“The Puritans in America”) and to whom he dedicated another (“The Real American Dream”). “To this day, every time I walk into a classroom, I hold him as the standard by which to teach,” he says.

Arriving at Columbia as a junior professor, he found living in New York City “endlessly fascinating” and usefully humbling (“Off campus, nobody cares whether you’re an Ivy League professor”). In a place where “everyone’s impatient and in a hurry,” he realized, the only way to keep people reading is to tell a good story.

Of the nine books he has written, he says his acclaimed 2005 portrait of Herman Melville is his most personal—his “heart book”—not least because Melville is the writer who means the most to him. The most demanding to write was his most recent, “The War Before the War” (2018), about the legal and moral crisis over fugitive slaves in the years before the Civil War. Writing it helped him to see the country’s race relations in a new light. Racist sentiment, he says, is “subtle, it’s pervasive...and the first step toward dealing with it is acknowledging it.”

The pandemic has depressed college enrollments and strained university budgets, and Mr. Delbanco worries that humanities departments will be the first to be cut. But if 2020 has taught us anything, he says, it’s that “we need to be able to have a reflective, deliberative conversation about who we want to be.”
 
Hard to put a price tag on it, but tremendous value in being able to think critically, be creative etc.

Someone told me once that we prepare students for a world that no longer exists. The skills taught today, may be irrelevant tomorrow. But being able to wrestle with interconnected concepts and also being adaptable does have value.

Mark Cuban made the case for liberal arts too

[URL]https://www.google.com/amp/s/w...ieves-liberal-arts-is-the-future-of-jobs/amp/[/URL]
 
Last edited:
Thank you JSJ, terrific piece.

My takeaway, the author properly credits a liberal arts education with small class sizes and an emphasis on humanities and the classics as preparing men and women for a place in the world. This sounds to me what schools like Grinnell, Davidson, Williams, Bates, Colby, Amherst, Holy Cross and smaller liberal arts-centric colleges do. These schools are not feeders to their graduate programs as many do not have same.

Then blessed with a remarkable educational foundation, their graduates go on to outperform their contemporaries from bigger schools, where the focus was more on career preparation.

Many of the graduates of these fine smaller schools, go into graduate programs in medicine, science, law, and business and, then, not only have that specific expertise but are well-rounded and can converse about Plato, Sophocles, Shakespeare, and fine art and music, along with law, finance or medicine. Dullards who were not exposed to these things might be expert, but only in one thing. Dr. Fauci credits and cherishes his liberal arts education, majoring in Classics, as being foundational to who he is today and his outstanding and compassionate career in medicine and science.


At St. John's in the 1970's I was placed in a program that similarly, exposed the group of students involved in the arts, music, philosophy, history, Greek and Latin, theology, foreign language, science, math and such with an aim to have us explore many things and not just one or a few things.

Something to ponder.
 
Back
Top