Back in 1974, there was big media coverage of the recently completed federal investigation of the "Superfecta Scandal" at several NY harness racetracks. Take a look at how the government described its case, as reported by the N.Y. Times:
"The Government had called its case a “mosaic of corruption” in which betting groups headed by Gerry netted $1‐million by bribing drivers to fix 43 superfecta races last year.
Defense lawyers called the case a “mirage concocted out of conjecture, innuendo and inference.” They argued that Gerry, a horse broker known to many of the drivers, beat the superfecta with handicapping and a “con” that enabled him to use other's people's money. Gerry's promises to financial backers that he had various drivers “in my pocket,” the defense contended, were simply the words of an expert tout.
How could Gerry be convicted if seven other nondriver defendants and all the drivers weren't? The answer probably lies in the testimony of Alan Cantor, a Government witness who said Gerry had given him $800 to finish out of the first four in a superfecta with a horse named San Marco.
Gerry's attorney argued that Cantor had told the Federal Bureau of Investigation the $800 was money Gerry owed him, and did not change his story until the trial. Under cross‐examination, Cantor admitted he told Gerry the horse had no chance of finishing in the first four anyway.
As to any of the driver defendants on trial, no direct evidence of a bribe was ever produced.
“The Government kept switching its theory,” said Arnold Roseman, attorney for one of the acquitted drivers, Real Cormier. “They changed their bills of particulars five times. First, it was drivers being bribed to lose. When that theory started falling apart, it was drivers being bribed to win. How can you bribe a driver to win?”
Michael Pollack, the aggressive 30‐year‐old chief prosecutor, took satisfaction in the fact that “bribery has been established.” Apparently, he still thinks harness racing is generally crooked.
“My mother goes to Brandywine Raceway once a year,” said Pollack, “and she always tells me, ‘they're thieves.’ When the indictments came out last December, she said on the phone, ‘I told you they were fixed.’”
Two unknowns were convicted of bribing harness drivers to lose. None of the drivers were convicted. First, the prosecution argued they were paid to lose, and then argued they were paid to win. The prosecution had 1 main witness, who may not have been all that credible. I think he had 2 horses in his stable, and was not a big name.
Starting to sound familiar? A "Mosaic of Corruption" vs. "We have your playbook". In the corrupt world of college basketball recruiting, not a single head coach was even indicted. A number of unknown or barely known names were convicted. The main government witness was flipped to avoid a ton of jail time. Some coaches said things on wiretapped conversations made one wonder what the heck was going on here. I thought "The Scheme" was an excellent documentary, primarily because Dawkins was a great narrator. Other than that, it will be business as usual.