Ray Morgan
Well-known member
Three point shooting percentage:
3 Wins in conference: Marquette: 46%, Georgetown: 41%, Creighton, 44%
5 losses: Hall: 36%, Nova: 37%, Depaul: 26%, Butler: 29%, Georgetown: 27%
At Hall, startling contrast between first and second half: 50% down to 18%
At Nova, similar: 43% to 29%
In close wins OOC against Cal, VCU and G Tech, 3 point shooting % was under 40%. But we shot a ton of free throws. Of course, there are a lot of other stats that need to be analyzed. So question to be answered is why a team of 4 and 5 star players is 3 and 5 in conference? For this team, they don't shoot it well from 3, they don't win. At least not against Big East teams.
Conference stats are attached:
https://bigeastconf_ftp.sidearmsports.com/custompages/sports/m-baskbl/2018-2019/confldrs.htm
Overall, a look at the conference team stats don't look that bad. Two stats, however, stand out: worst defensive rebounding team in conference, which was predictable, and worst offensive rebounding %, which I guess means % of our own misses we rebound. Stats matter. I'm just not sure why, leading the conference in creating turnovers, and third on 3% field goal %, we are this bad. Thoughts?
3 Wins in conference: Marquette: 46%, Georgetown: 41%, Creighton, 44%
5 losses: Hall: 36%, Nova: 37%, Depaul: 26%, Butler: 29%, Georgetown: 27%
At Hall, startling contrast between first and second half: 50% down to 18%
At Nova, similar: 43% to 29%
In close wins OOC against Cal, VCU and G Tech, 3 point shooting % was under 40%. But we shot a ton of free throws. Of course, there are a lot of other stats that need to be analyzed. So question to be answered is why a team of 4 and 5 star players is 3 and 5 in conference? For this team, they don't shoot it well from 3, they don't win. At least not against Big East teams.
Conference stats are attached:
https://bigeastconf_ftp.sidearmsports.com/custompages/sports/m-baskbl/2018-2019/confldrs.htm
Overall, a look at the conference team stats don't look that bad. Two stats, however, stand out: worst defensive rebounding team in conference, which was predictable, and worst offensive rebounding %, which I guess means % of our own misses we rebound. Stats matter. I'm just not sure why, leading the conference in creating turnovers, and third on 3% field goal %, we are this bad. Thoughts?