My biggest criticism of Coach Lavin is that I believe his optimism and positivity allows the players to take it easy a bit too much. They don't feel a sense of urgency until it is truly urgent (season-wise as well as within individual games). I think Dunlap was the guy who didn't allow that to happen in the past. Did targeting February as the time they would gel allow the team to slack off until then? Next year, he should demand results from day one.
My biggest criticism of Coach Lavin is that I believe his optimism and positivity allows the players to take it easy a bit too much. They don't feel a sense of urgency until it is truly urgent (season-wise as well as within individual games). I think Dunlap was the guy who didn't allow that to happen in the past. Did targeting February as the time they would gel allow the team to slack off until then? Next year, he should demand results from day one.
My biggest criticism of Coach Lavin is that I believe his optimism and positivity allows the players to take it easy a bit too much. They don't feel a sense of urgency until it is truly urgent (season-wise as well as within individual games). I think Dunlap was the guy who didn't allow that to happen in the past. Did targeting February as the time they would gel allow the team to slack off until then? Next year, he should demand results from day one.
My biggest criticism of Coach Lavin is that I believe his optimism and positivity allows the players to take it easy a bit too much. They don't feel a sense of urgency until it is truly urgent (season-wise as well as within individual games). I think Dunlap was the guy who didn't allow that to happen in the past. Did targeting February as the time they would gel allow the team to slack off until then? Next year, he should demand results from day one.
I support Lavin and do not want to see him fired. Having said that, I do think your critique is well said and well founded. Can't argue with what you say.