Appreciate the thoughtful analysis in this article related to an obvious issue, especially as it relates to not creating transition offense which is a key for us. Also have little doubt technique can be improved.
But we start a 4 at the 5 and a 3 at the 4, and our closest thing to a true 5 off the bench is more of a stretch/long/athletic big. Our third leading rebounder is a 6-1, 170 pound freshman guard (credit to him). So on one level we just need true inside/post players. Effort and technique likely isn't stopping Delgado. He's had double digit boards in all but 4 games this season (all but 1 in the Big East) and has chewed up much bigger more physical teams than us. You slow Delgado with guys like him which we obviously need.
Or with overall team commitment to the space, which we seem to lack. Nova doesn't play a guy over 6-9 and is mostly more in the 6-5 to 6-7 range. On a day when the teams shot fairly similar percentages and had fairly similar TO numbers (albeit Nova a little better in both categories), it's tough to explain a deficit of 21 on the glass. But everyone that played for Nova that game had at least 3 rebounds. We only had one guy with more than 3, four guys with 1, and another with 0.
Small sample size and slightly misleading as 2 of our guys played under 5 minutes, but the point is on Villanova everyone rebounds. On SJU everyone doesn't and I'm not sure I understand why the #3 team in the country has players with way more talent than some of our guys rebounding and we don't. There are a few players in particular who think what they primarily bring to this team is offense and what they probably should be bringing is other things like rebounding (and defense).