Two of our brothers were having an exchange ,one pointing out about the other needing paragraphs and or typos. I know there are a lot of smart posters on this site who probably majored in english but pointing out these things is silly. There has not, been one post that I could not decipher what was being said. Lets just enjoy this site, the mods did a great job and put a lot of effort into it.We do not have to have verbal cats fight,just a waste of time Be smart us self control
pettiness
- Thread starter usguard
- Start date
[quote="usguard" post=284115]Two of our brothers were having an exchange ,one pointing out about the other needing paragraphs and or typos. I know there are a lot of smart posters on this site who probably majored in english but pointing out these things is silly. There has not, been one post that I could not decipher what was being said. Lets just enjoy this site, the mods did a great job and put a lot of effort into it.We do not have to have verbal cats fight,just a waste of time Be smart us self control[/quote]
Good idea, usguard. “Verbal cat fights”—Not.
Done.
Thanks.
Good idea, usguard. “Verbal cat fights”—Not.
Done.
Thanks.
Last edited:
[quote="usguard" post=284115]Two of our brothers were having an exchange ,one pointing out about the other needing paragraphs and or typos. I know there are a lot of smart posters on this site who probably majored in english but pointing out these things is silly. There has not, been one post that I could not decipher what was being said. Lets just enjoy this site, the mods did a great job and put a lot of effort into it.We do not have to have verbal cats fight,just a waste of time Be smart us self control[/quote]
Good post but why the comma after "There has not"?
Good post but why the comma after "There has not"?
[quote="bamafan" post=284128][quote="usguard" post=284115]Two of our brothers were having an exchange ,one pointing out about the other needing paragraphs and or typos. I know there are a lot of smart posters on this site who probably majored in english but pointing out these things is silly. There has not, been one post that I could not decipher what was being said. Lets just enjoy this site, the mods did a great job and put a lot of effort into it.We do not have to have verbal cats fight,just a waste of time Be smart us self control[/quote]
Good post but why the comma after "There has not"? [/quote]
He also wrote "Lets", instead of Let's.
Good post but why the comma after "There has not"?
[/quote]He also wrote "Lets", instead of Let's.
Class of 72
Active member
[quote="usguard" post=284115]Two of our brothers were having an exchange ,one pointing out about the other needing paragraphs and or typos. I know there are a lot of smart posters on this site who probably majored in english but pointing out these things is silly. There has not, been one post that I could not decipher what was being said. Lets just enjoy this site, the mods did a great job and put a lot of effort into it.We do not have to have verbal cats fight,just a waste of time Be smart us self control[/quote]
I agree!
Just want to point out a couple of things: I think you meant "cat fights". There should be a period after "time". Also, I think you meant to say "use" self control.
Finally, you stated "two of our brothers". They only way a few of these guys would be brothers is if incest was involved given how wacko some are here. Just kidding! Most are wacko. hmy: hmy:
I agree!
Just want to point out a couple of things: I think you meant "cat fights". There should be a period after "time". Also, I think you meant to say "use" self control.
Finally, you stated "two of our brothers". They only way a few of these guys would be brothers is if incest was involved given how wacko some are here. Just kidding! Most are wacko.
hmy: hmy:
[quote="usguard" post=284145]Now lets get back to basketball! Do we get a big for next yr or will we go with what we have so far. MO is that I think we will be between 18-20 wins or am I too optimistic?[/quote]
The IG on this Board from Paultz and others says nay, move on, and root, root, root for what we got.
Should still be a good year IF Ponds returns.
I think you're low at 18-20; I've got 21-23.
Of course, I could be high.
LOL
The IG on this Board from Paultz and others says nay, move on, and root, root, root for what we got.
Should still be a good year IF Ponds returns.
I think you're low at 18-20; I've got 21-23.
Of course, I could be high.
LOL
rawdognyc
Well-known member
[quote="usguard" post=284145]Now lets get back to basketball! Do we get a big for next yr or will we go with what we have so far. MO is that I think we will be between 18-20 wins or am I too optimistic?[/quote]
If we only have 18 wins, with or without Slick, then even I think a shake up would be warranted. We won 16 last year with basically a 6 man rotation. We will have plenty of depth this year, albeit not in the big area, however I don't think that'll hurt us as much as everyone thinks. We can talk about what if Keita this and what if Roberts that, but there will always be question marks. Even without Shamorie, I feel our guard play will be fine. Granted not as good as with slick, however in a down year for the BE, we should be dancing and have 20 wins minimum either way. Granted I'm a homer
If we only have 18 wins, with or without Slick, then even I think a shake up would be warranted. We won 16 last year with basically a 6 man rotation. We will have plenty of depth this year, albeit not in the big area, however I don't think that'll hurt us as much as everyone thinks. We can talk about what if Keita this and what if Roberts that, but there will always be question marks. Even without Shamorie, I feel our guard play will be fine. Granted not as good as with slick, however in a down year for the BE, we should be dancing and have 20 wins minimum either way. Granted I'm a homer
[quote="rawdognyc" post=284177][quote="usguard" post=284145]Now lets get back to basketball! Do we get a big for next yr or will we go with what we have so far. MO is that I think we will be between 18-20 wins or am I too optimistic?[/quote]
If we only have 18 wins, with or without Slick, then even I think a shake up would be warranted. We won 16 last year with basically a 6 man rotation. We will have plenty of depth this year, albeit not in the big area, however I don't think that'll hurt us as much as everyone thinks. We can talk about what if Keita this and what if Roberts that, but there will always be question marks. Even without Shamorie, I feel our guard play will be fine. Granted not as good as with slick, however in a down year for the BE, we should be dancing and have 20 wins minimum either way. Granted I'm a homer[/quote]
I think the most common range for end-of-Season standings without Ponds is 7th - 10th place, so guessing 14 - 18 wins in that scenario.
With Ponds it’s say, 3rd - 5th place and roughly 18 - 21 wins.
All of it the product of gut, guesswork, and body twists, along with gnashing teeth.
If we only have 18 wins, with or without Slick, then even I think a shake up would be warranted. We won 16 last year with basically a 6 man rotation. We will have plenty of depth this year, albeit not in the big area, however I don't think that'll hurt us as much as everyone thinks. We can talk about what if Keita this and what if Roberts that, but there will always be question marks. Even without Shamorie, I feel our guard play will be fine. Granted not as good as with slick, however in a down year for the BE, we should be dancing and have 20 wins minimum either way. Granted I'm a homer[/quote]
I think the most common range for end-of-Season standings without Ponds is 7th - 10th place, so guessing 14 - 18 wins in that scenario.
With Ponds it’s say, 3rd - 5th place and roughly 18 - 21 wins.
All of it the product of gut, guesswork, and body twists, along with gnashing teeth.