It's a nice article, but I never project how well someone will do especially when he will be playing at a higher level. Even a guy like Heron, who was a productive player at Auburn, was not anywhere near the player he was projected to be. There are basically 3 steps to evaluating a player after he signs - first in pre-season practices, which give you an inkling (Anderson was thrilled with what Posh after seeing him at practice every day) 2nd, the generally soft OOC season (Josh Roberts was so much of a beast in OOC Anderson season1 one that on here Mullin was openly criticized for not playing him more. Then of course, Roberts wilted in the the Big East season). Finally in the first half dozen Big East season games, you kind of separate the wheat from the chaff - the players step up, and not not ready for prime time players fall back.
We need capable big bodies, so best I would offer for Stanley is hope. If he can offer reasonable productivity as a rotation player off the bench, he will be of value. Agree with everything you said, Beast . Except about Heron . IMHO, Heron was a capable BE Player that was hampered by injuries in Year 1 with Mullin and then injuries again in Year 1 with Anderson . He never was really 100 percent and playing for 3 Coaches , Pearl , Mullin and Anderson in 3 successive years is difficult for any player . Plus , In his first year we had Ponds , Simon and Clark as the focal pieces of Mullin’s team . Both He and Figgy had to adjust to that and then Anderson with his first year .