Name Image and Likeness

Moose

Well-known member
Figured I might as well start a thread on this topic.

From Sportico today some interesting points especially with regards to INTL playersOne high-profile NIL complication has flown under the radar. More than 20,000 athletes come from abroad each year to play in the NCAA. But it’s possible that athletes on student visas won’t be able to make money off NIL at all. The ComplicationCollege athletes who come to U.S. schools from abroad usually require “F” visas, which allow them into the country for educational purposes.  Athletes with these visas can only “do limited on-campus employment here and there,” Robert Seiger, an immigration lawyer and partner of Archer & Greiner P.C.’s sports law practice, told FOS.NIL laws will allow athletes to sign endorsements, work at or run sports clinics, and even sign autographs. But if international athletes participate in those deals, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services could revoke their student visas.“There’s no question in my mind that that government entity would be like, ‘Wait a minute,’” Seiger said.Potential SolutionsIn the immediate future, there’s an easy “solution” for international athletes who don’t want to lose their visas: Don’t profit from NIL.The way the government “ultimately perceives” NIL activity could determine whether international athletes can sign NIL deals, Seiger said. Perhaps immigration authorities will decide that NIL compensation falls under the umbrella of limited, on-campus employment.Otherwise, advocacy and lobbying could successfully push for new laws that would allow athletes to keep their F visa status.If they’re making money, could athletes apply for visas as professionals? That possibility is a long way away. The NCAA has spent millions in court fighting for amateur status, and shows no signs of giving that up anytime soon. “This is like a low-simmer issue because there’s so much uncertainty,” Seiger said. When laws take effect, “I think it’ll be an issue that comes more to the front.”“Like, OK, now we’re faced with the reality.”
 
I don't understand the inner-workings of the NIL, how kids can make money and for what purpose, and how that can possibly be leveraged by schools to recruit.  But as a general proposition, given Repole's business and what he does for a living, isn't this a way he could really really help us on the recruiting front with probably minimal impact to his bottom line/business?
 
Paultzman post=435622 said:
University of Illinois athletics will host an open house event for local businesses Tuesday at 6 to provide info and answer questions regarding NIL, which is set to take effect Thursday. AD Josh Whitman and MBB coach Brad Underwood will be among the speakers.

https://twitter.com/matt_fortuna/status/1409558895723438096?s=21
This is an excellent move to prevent "funny business" and also to help athletes in gaining an access to those interested by having a meet and greet.  Don't know how much sponsor enthusiasm in NYC with all the pro athletes in the market.  However in areas of the country with no pro sports, this is a great opportunity for players (eg., Alabama businesses will be lining up at the door).
 
Paultzman post=435622 said:
University of Illinois athletics will host an open house event for local businesses Tuesday at 6 to provide info and answer questions regarding NIL, which is set to take effect Thursday. AD Josh Whitman and MBB coach Brad Underwood will be among the speakers.

https://twitter.com/matt_fortuna/status/1409558895723438096?s=21

Smart move. I know a few folks in the Illinois athletic department and they are top notch and will ensure their student athletes can do this the right way.  
 
Zach B

St. John's is planning to have its own guidelines for student-athletes to profit off their Name, Image and Likeness starting Thursday, granted NIL gets approved as expected tomorrow. Told there will be very few limitations. #sjubb

He noted they'll limit gambling, alcohol and tobacco companies and areas like that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So what’s the consensus on this? Will it help us Bc we have the biggest market in the world or hurt us bc bigger programs/blue bloods will offer kids money we can’t compete with? 
 
Not an alum post=435698 said:
So what’s the consensus on this? Will it help us Bc we have the biggest market in the world or hurt us bc bigger programs/blue bloods will offer kids money we can’t compete with? 

Honestly nobody really knows yet.  Like with transfer mania I think we have to buckle up, slowly accelerate and see what happens.

The important thing is having smart people in the athletic department during these times.  That we do.  Under former regimes I fear we would have been a trainwreck if this happened under their watch.
 
Last edited:
If we are being pro active behind the scenes, there's no way this should not help. You tell kids this is essentially how you start capitalizing on your success while in school. It will also be a way to "drop bags" to players and show future recruits what can be done "legally" - with the right support system. Technically SJU can't do the leg work for the players, but you're crazy if agents / others aren't already road mapping what to do for certain type of star players / potential star players. And if you win - in NY - marketing is endless...plus social media...
 
Is there a cap on the amount kids can make?

Say for instance I invented something that revolutionized the world and my cashflow was endless.

Could I pay players millions of dollars each to appear in my commercials?
 
I think their is too much competition for ad dollars among NYC for advertisers dollars.  Our student athletes will have to compete with 8 professional teams (not including 2 MLS teams).  Look at the press in the newspapers alone and see how much space goes to college sports versus professional.  In Alabama, Bama and Auburn dominate the press and local advertisers would see potential customers relate more to college athletes rather than pro.  Same is true in the vast majority of states.  Who in NYC would think having an NIL of a St. John's athlete would increase their product sales???? 
 
NEWS: The Division I Board of Directors has voted to approve the interim NIL policy, a source tells @TheAthletic.

College athletes in all 50 states will be able to monetize their names, images and likenesses starting tomorrow (July 1). Doing so will no longer violate NCAA rules.
 
I wonder if the players will be permitted to have professional representation (i.e. agents) for advertising/sponsorship agreements.  Of course, this could open up another can of worms.
 
Last edited:
Unless you were a Zion W. Or the like, I don't think you'll get national advertising.  I think it will be big where boosters who have companies and cash to spend can offer these $ opportunities to help their program even if it isn't needed/successful to actually grow new business.
 
Back
Top