Not to bring up old wounds, and I know he often played this game so perhaps it's nothing, but could Lavin's advice to Sampson not to sign a LOI, and I believe that is what we were going to do with Briscoe as well, be because Lavin in part was going to use that as "leverage" re: an extension, etc.?
Obviously I know Doughty signed, but Doughty was not in a class like Sampson/Briscoe where options would be there for him for sure at top schools in the spring.
Just curious if that was done entirely in the player's best interest, or if it was also self-interested advice.
Obviously I know Doughty signed, but Doughty was not in a class like Sampson/Briscoe where options would be there for him for sure at top schools in the spring.
Just curious if that was done entirely in the player's best interest, or if it was also self-interested advice.