It is Oscar Time for 2019 Movies

BrooklynRed

Well-known member
2023 $upporter
since this section of the board has a variety of topics and a lot of wonderfully diverse opinions, I was surprised there was no discussion of movies/oscars.

The finalists were announced yesterday and would enjoy hearing opinions. Do you favor The Irishman, 1917, Once Upon a Time ...In Hollywood, Little Women, etc. I have seen a number of the finalists and still have a few more to view before picking my 2019 favorite. Not on the list for best picture (understandably) but enjoyable film entertainment if you like mysteries that keep you guessing--Knives Out and dramas based on true stories Bombshell and Just Mercy.
 
I feel like I've seen less movies this year than in others and haven't kept up with what is up for what awards, but "Parasite" was probably the best movie I've seen in theaters this year. Saw the new Almodóvar movie last night. Enjoyed it a lot.
 
I think that the biggest mistake the Academy made this year, was nominating Toy Story 4 for best animated feature, while leaving out Frozen 2. Frozen 2 was a far superior film, IMO.
 
[quote="SJU61982" post=375518]I think that the biggest mistake the Academy made this year, was nominating Toy Story 4 for best animated feature, while leaving out Frozen 2. Frozen 2 was a far superior film, IMO.[/quote]

This is a baaaaadddd take
 
[quote="L J S A" post=375517]I feel like I've seen less movies this year than in others and haven't kept up with what is up for what awards, but "Parasite" was probably the best movie I've seen in theaters this year. Saw the new Almodóvar movie last night. Enjoyed it a lot.[/quote]

Saw parasite this past week and was blown away. Also saw 1917 a couple weeks ago and thought it was great. If one of those two win best film I will be happy.

As for the Toy Story and Frozen 2 comment I saw above, I strongly disagree.

I grew up on the toy story movies and a lot of people seem to think 4 was not a worthy entry in the series. I actually disagree. The movie itself was extremely fun and well paced. On top of that, I really liked the message of that film. I thought it was a lot more powerful than frozen 2. Toy story 4 dealt with a lot of mature themes like self worth, finding your purpose, etc.

As a senior in college who doesn’t really know where he’s going after graduation in terms of career, that film totally struck a chord with me and the way it handled characters who felt lost in a way but found their purpose.

That’s probably too much of a deep dive into a toy story film, but yea, I loved it
 
We saw Parasite a couple weeks ago and loved it. That and once upon a time in Hollywood were my 2 favorites this year. Loved the Irishman too but these 2 better
 
[quote="Jack Williams" post=375520][quote="L J S A" post=375517]I feel like I've seen less movies this year than in others and haven't kept up with what is up for what awards, but "Parasite" was probably the best movie I've seen in theaters this year. Saw the new Almodóvar movie last night. Enjoyed it a lot.[/quote]

Saw parasite this past week and was blown away. Also saw 1917 a couple weeks ago and thought it was great. If one of those two win best film I will be happy.

As for the Toy Story and Frozen 2 comment I saw above, I strongly disagree.

I grew up on the toy story movies and a lot of people seem to think 4 was not a worthy entry in the series. I actually disagree. The movie itself was extremely fun and well paced. On top of that, I really liked the message of that film. I thought it was a lot more powerful than frozen 2. Toy story 4 dealt with a lot of mature themes like self worth, finding your purpose, etc.

As a senior in college who doesn’t really know where he’s going after graduation in terms of career, that film totally struck a chord with me and the way it handled characters who felt lost in a way but found their purpose.

That’s probably too much of a deep dive into a toy story film, but yea, I loved it[/quote]

My main issue with Toy Story 4, is that I felt it was totally unnecessary. One of the things I liked about #3, was that I felt it ended the saga effectively. This one just felt like a pointless add-on, IMO. It wasn't bad, per say, but didn't add anything to the saga, IMO. I've always been a bit of a contrarian on the Toy Story films, though. 2 and 4 were the two movies that everyone praised, but that I thought were just OK. OTOH, I think that 1 and 3 are classics, where the reviews on them were solid, but not spectacular.

Frozen 2 was not as good as the original, but I liked the story. It lacked the killer musical number that the first one had, but this was more about story, and Elsa's character (who I find easy to sympathize with), and I just plain bought it, more then I did Toy Story. Frankly, it's the first thing I've seen Disney do right with Frozen since the first film came out, since the Broadway musical, and the EPCOT ride, both left quite a bit to be desired, IMO.
 
I realize that this movie might resonate more to people with certain "hobbies", and that Sandler might have some preconceived notions with his work.... but Uncut Gems was as an exhilarating time I've had in a theatre since high school. The music that accompanied the scenes was very well placed. They way it was shot felt real.

There was hardly a let down the whole movie. Highly recommend for those who haven't seen it. (saw 1917 shortly after, and that was just truly impressive film making. the whole one scene shot aspect- real cool)
 
Last edited:
[quote="Brian3" post=375602]I realize that this movie might resonate more to people with certain "hobbies", and that Sandler might have some preconceived notions with his work.... but Uncut Gems was as an exhilarating time I've had in a theatre since high school. The music that accompanied the scenes was very well placed. They way it was shot felt real.

There was hardly a let down the whole movie. Highly recommend for those who haven't seen it. (saw 1917 shortly after, and that was just truly impressive film making. the whole one scene shot aspect- real cool)[/quote]

I hated that movie. I understand the Safdie brothers go for that type of anxiety inducing filmmaking, but god that movie gave me a headache.

Sandler’s character, I just wanted him to shut tf up for the entirety of the movie. So much yelling. So much pointless yelling. Best part of the movie was his mistress, the actress who played her had a real breakthrough performance I thought.
 
[quote="SJU61982" post=375589][quote="Jack Williams" post=375520][quote="L J S A" post=375517]I feel like I've seen less movies this year than in others and haven't kept up with what is up for what awards, but "Parasite" was probably the best movie I've seen in theaters this year. Saw the new Almodóvar movie last night. Enjoyed it a lot.[/quote]

Saw parasite this past week and was blown away. Also saw 1917 a couple weeks ago and thought it was great. If one of those two win best film I will be happy.

As for the Toy Story and Frozen 2 comment I saw above, I strongly disagree.

I grew up on the toy story movies and a lot of people seem to think 4 was not a worthy entry in the series. I actually disagree. The movie itself was extremely fun and well paced. On top of that, I really liked the message of that film. I thought it was a lot more powerful than frozen 2. Toy story 4 dealt with a lot of mature themes like self worth, finding your purpose, etc.

As a senior in college who doesn’t really know where he’s going after graduation in terms of career, that film totally struck a chord with me and the way it handled characters who felt lost in a way but found their purpose.

That’s probably too much of a deep dive into a toy story film, but yea, I loved it[/quote]

My main issue with Toy Story 4, is that I felt it was totally unnecessary. One of the things I liked about #3, was that I felt it ended the saga effectively. This one just felt like a pointless add-on, IMO. It wasn't bad, per say, but didn't add anything to the saga, IMO. I've always been a bit of a contrarian on the Toy Story films, though. 2 and 4 were the two movies that everyone praised, but that I thought were just OK. OTOH, I think that 1 and 3 are classics, where the reviews on them were solid, but not spectacular.

Frozen 2 was not as good as the original, but I liked the story. It lacked the killer musical number that the first one had, but this was more about story, and Elsa's character (who I find easy to sympathize with), and I just plain bought it, more then I did Toy Story. Frankly, it's the first thing I've seen Disney do right with Frozen since the first film came out, since the Broadway musical, and the EPCOT ride, both left quite a bit to be desired, IMO.[/quote]

I just personally thought it was a great epilogue of sorts to the original trilogy. When I saw the movie in theaters, my parents and sisters who went with me said what you said, the movie didn’t feel “important” enough or it didn’t have enough weight to it in a way.

I totally get that, I actually think toy story 4 should have been branded as a Woody spin off film and not an actual follow up to 3.

But at the same time, as I said before, I think the film had a lot more weight to it than people give it credit. Some may find it silly, but I really found it profound how (SPOILER) Woody realized how blessed he’s been to have kids his whole life, and found a new purpose giving other toys that feeling as much as he could.

It was a worthy follow up to 3. He said his goodbyes to Andy and found a new kid, but then came to the realization that maybe it was time to help others find that purpose in their lives and feel what he’s felt for so long.

To me that’s a brave choice for Pixar to make after they wrapped everything up with a bow on it in 3. It made the characters like woody feel more alive than ever even though they are toys.

Apologies if my posts are really long I just really love talking about movies and Toy Story 4 was fantastic to me.
 
[quote="Brian3" post=375602]I realize that this movie might resonate more to people with certain "hobbies", and that Sandler might have some preconceived notions with his work.... but Uncut Gems was as an exhilarating time I've had in a theatre since high school. The music that accompanied the scenes was very well placed. They way it was shot felt real.

There was hardly a let down the whole movie. Highly recommend for those who haven't seen it. (saw 1917 shortly after, and that was just truly impressive film making. the whole one scene shot aspect- real cool)[/quote] Haven't seen unicut gems. Is that a netflix movie ?
 
Also for lovers of movies I’ve been listening to this podcast for awhile called “The Rewatchables”.

They pick great movies and do deep dives on them, I enjoy their commentary quite a bit.

It’s run by Bill Simmons, who I understand a lot of people may hate since there’s a lot of New York fans on this site and he’s a Boston guy.

But in this film discussion type setting he comes across as just another guy, he lets his co hosts who are more so film experts dissect the films and he chimes in every now and again.

They just had Quentin Tarantino on for a couple episodes as well.

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-rewatchables/id1268527882
 
[quote="mjmaherjr" post=375606][quote="Brian3" post=375602]I realize that this movie might resonate more to people with certain "hobbies", and that Sandler might have some preconceived notions with his work.... but Uncut Gems was as an exhilarating time I've had in a theatre since high school. The music that accompanied the scenes was very well placed. They way it was shot felt real.

There was hardly a let down the whole movie. Highly recommend for those who haven't seen it. (saw 1917 shortly after, and that was just truly impressive film making. the whole one scene shot aspect- real cool)[/quote] Haven't seen unicut gems. Is that a netflix movie ?[/quote]

It is available on Netflix as of last Friday.
 
[quote="austour" post=375614][quote="mjmaherjr" post=375606][quote="Brian3" post=375602]I realize that this movie might resonate more to people with certain "hobbies", and that Sandler might have some preconceived notions with his work.... but Uncut Gems was as an exhilarating time I've had in a theatre since high school. The music that accompanied the scenes was very well placed. They way it was shot felt real.

There was hardly a let down the whole movie. Highly recommend for those who haven't seen it. (saw 1917 shortly after, and that was just truly impressive film making. the whole one scene shot aspect- real cool)[/quote] Haven't seen unicut gems. Is that a netflix movie ?[/quote]

It is available on Netflix as of last Friday.[/quote]

Really? Not for me
 
[quote="Jack Williams" post=375620][quote="austour" post=375614][quote="mjmaherjr" post=375606][quote="Brian3" post=375602]I realize that this movie might resonate more to people with certain "hobbies", and that Sandler might have some preconceived notions with his work.... but Uncut Gems was as an exhilarating time I've had in a theatre since high school. The music that accompanied the scenes was very well placed. They way it was shot felt real.

There was hardly a let down the whole movie. Highly recommend for those who haven't seen it. (saw 1917 shortly after, and that was just truly impressive film making. the whole one scene shot aspect- real cool)[/quote] Haven't seen unicut gems. Is that a netflix movie ?[/quote]

It is available on Netflix as of last Friday.[/quote]

Really? Not for me[/quote]

Sorry, only in the UK and Asia/Pac. Ooops.
 
Since you asked...
I've seen all the nominees since I get screeners and free admission to movies this time of year. Maybe we'll hear from mjmaherjr as well.
Here goes.
BEST PICTURE: The Joker on so many levels. Ford versus Ferrari is up there...highly entertaining. The Irishman loses out because people expected Goodfellas and this isn't on that level. It's up there as well. You can see me in a couple of scenes with Pacino and Romano if you don't blink. Worst choice is Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. The studio spent a fortune promoting this piece of doo doo (which is how it's done. Any poster here could have written it... Lucky Bombshell wasn't on the list. It totally pales in comparison to The Loudest Voice. As an aside, Russell Crowe totally nailed Roger Ailes...but no award for him.
BEST ACTOR: Joaquin Phoenix takes this hands down...but who knows? Christian Bale whose Vice was totally on the money was totally screwed by the guy who lip synced Freddie Mercury. He could have been nominated for Ford vs Ferrari as a make good. Antonio Bandaras was a revelation in Pain and Glory. Leonardo DiCaprio was also excellent as were the others. Jamie Foxx should have had a nomination for Just Mercy but he got the shaft.
BEST ACTRESS: Rene Zellweger despite her suck on a lemon look nailed Judy and even did her own singing. I've heard complaints that JLo wasn't nominated for Hustlers...but JLo played JLo and turned a movie about prostitution into one of her mailed-in chick flicks.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR: Brad Pitt played Brad Pitt...so if you like Brad Pitt, you won't be sorry when he wins. No stretch here. Not deserving. Joe Pesci deserves it for the Irishman with Al Pacino close behind. My wife says Pacino mailed it in...but you don't need to go to acting school if you work with Pacino. He's an eye opener. The Oscar should go to Wesley Snipes for his role in Dolomite Is My Name. Not even a nomination? For you Eddie Murphy fans...he did a great job but I'm not upset he didn't get the recognition because he pretty much played all his characters.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS: I love Laura Dern...but I wanted to strangle her in Marriage Story. She nailed it. Florence Pugh of Little Woman can act. I'd recommend you see her as a wrestler in Fighting With My Family if you get a chance. Kathy Bates was strong in Richard Jewell. You should see that movie. I used ESPN's 30 30 mini documentary on the Jewell case as part of my fake news segment when I was teaching at SUNY Rockland.
BEST FOREIGN MOVIE; Parasite should win. I thought it was a bit overrated. Maybe I'll watch it again. The Farewell with Queens own Akwafina was completely ignored. To me, it was worthy of an Oscar.

That's my two cents. Anyone?
 
[quote="mjmaherjr" post=375606][quote="Brian3" post=375602]I realize that this movie might resonate more to people with certain "hobbies", and that Sandler might have some preconceived notions with his work.... but Uncut Gems was as an exhilarating time I've had in a theatre since high school. The music that accompanied the scenes was very well placed. They way it was shot felt real.

There was hardly a let down the whole movie. Highly recommend for those who haven't seen it. (saw 1917 shortly after, and that was just truly impressive film making. the whole one scene shot aspect- real cool)[/quote] Haven't seen unicut gems. Is that a netflix movie ?[/quote]


Don't see it. Dark, annoying and noisy from the beginning. Sandler did play a very good part though.
 
Last edited:
Just saw Last Full Measures, a true story regarding the awarding of a Medal of Honor. Great actors include Ed Harris, Samuel Jackson and Christopher Plummer. Should see some Oscar nominations next year. BTW, bring tissues.
 
[quote="JackofVirginia" post=375655][quote="mjmaherjr" post=375606][quote="Brian3" post=375602]I realize that this movie might resonate more to people with certain "hobbies", and that Sandler might have some preconceived notions with his work.... but Uncut Gems was as an exhilarating time I've had in a theatre since high school. The music that accompanied the scenes was very well placed. They way it was shot felt real.

There was hardly a let down the whole movie. Highly recommend for those who haven't seen it. (saw 1917 shortly after, and that was just truly impressive film making. the whole one scene shot aspect- real cool)[/quote] Haven't seen unicut gems. Is that a netflix movie ?[/quote]


Don't see it. Dark, annoying and noisy from the beginning. Sandler did play a very good part though.[/quote]

oh man- surprised im in the minority here given some of the point spread discussions. let me try again- if you have ever been in a hole before... watch it lol
 
[quote="newsman13" post=375654]Since you asked...
I've seen all the nominees since I get screeners and free admission to movies this time of year. Maybe we'll hear from mjmaherjr as well.
Here goes.
BEST PICTURE: The Joker on so many levels. Ford versus Ferrari is up there...highly entertaining. The Irishman loses out because people expected Goodfellas and this isn't on that level. It's up there as well. You can see me in a couple of scenes with Pacino and Romano if you don't blink. Worst choice is Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. The studio spent a fortune promoting this piece of doo doo (which is how it's done. Any poster here could have written it... Lucky Bombshell wasn't on the list. It totally pales in comparison to The Loudest Voice. As an aside, Russell Crowe totally nailed Roger Ailes...but no award for him.
BEST ACTOR: Joaquin Phoenix takes this hands down...but who knows? Christian Bale whose Vice was totally on the money was totally screwed by the guy who lip synced Freddie Mercury. He could have been nominated for Ford vs Ferrari as a make good. Antonio Bandaras was a revelation in Pain and Glory. Leonardo DiCaprio was also excellent as were the others. Jamie Foxx should have had a nomination for Just Mercy but he got the shaft.
BEST ACTRESS: Rene Zellweger despite her suck on a lemon look nailed Judy and even did her own singing. I've heard complaints that JLo wasn't nominated for Hustlers...but JLo played JLo and turned a movie about prostitution into one of her mailed-in chick flicks.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR: Brad Pitt played Brad Pitt...so if you like Brad Pitt, you won't be sorry when he wins. No stretch here. Not deserving. Joe Pesci deserves it for the Irishman with Al Pacino close behind. My wife says Pacino mailed it in...but you don't need to go to acting school if you work with Pacino. He's an eye opener. The Oscar should go to Wesley Snipes for his role in Dolomite Is My Name. Not even a nomination? For you Eddie Murphy fans...he did a great job but I'm not upset he didn't get the recognition because he pretty much played all his characters.
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS: I love Laura Dern...but I wanted to strangle her in Marriage Story. She nailed it. Florence Pugh of Little Woman can act. I'd recommend you see her as a wrestler in Fighting With My Family if you get a chance. Kathy Bates was strong in Richard Jewell. You should see that movie. I used ESPN's 30 30 mini documentary on the Jewell case as part of my fake news segment when I was teaching at SUNY Rockland.
BEST FOREIGN MOVIE; Parasite should win. I thought it was a bit overrated. Maybe I'll watch it again. The Farewell with Queens own Akwafina was completely ignored. To me, it was worthy of an Oscar.

That's my two cents. Anyone?[/quote] We still have some screeners to watch that Nat got in the mail but I dont know if she got Ford Vs Ferrari. Unless that was one of the ones to view online

Nat loved the Joker. She watched it like 5 times I think. I liked it but definitely have to give it a second chance.

I have to think about the other categories. I'll make a list this week

I loved once upon a time in hollywood though. The last 20 minutes or so starting at the point where DiCaprio goes outside and starts yelling at the kinds to the point he was next door telling the guy at the gate what happened was one of my favorite funniest 20 minutes of movies. I couldn't stop cracking up especially during the break in and then Leo describing to the guy at the gate what happened. Omg I was dying
 
Back
Top