I really thought that was the worst officiating I had seen in many years.
I replayed the game this morning for some family members and they commented that
it seemed the refs were determined to keep SJU from running Providence out of the gym, with
phantom fouls. I was upset that Lavin didn't deliberately get a technical just so he could have three minutes screaming at the ludicrous nature of the some the calls and to make them aware that
he wasn't going to take them "making it close". I didn't blame Harrison for having to walk off the court to cool off for a minute or Lavin for looking astounded multiple times.
Since I felt that strongly I was also surprised at how little comment was made by the announcers about so many controversial calls. In fact, in two cases, when the fouls were against SJU (like when Providence ran up the floor on Harrison's back and the ball went out of bounds, they called it Providence ball instead of a foul) or...well, there were many...the only comment was "GOOD PLAY by whatever Providence player had just gotten away with the abuse.
We should have won that game by 25 points if we got 40% of the close calls. I admit the refs also fell for the Pointer drama act on one play. Anyway, I thought it was so overtly one sided, it should have gotten some more commentary.