If they have to sit out a year, instead of two years, then it's fine. If they can transfer within the conference and be immediately eligible the following year, then I'm no fan of the new rule.RedStormNC post=434685 said:
bamafan post=434708 said:With all this player freedom should give some power back to the schools. How about the right to trade players? Still need that ever elusive big man and having a plethora of guards on your roster? Trade a guard for a big. /media/kunena/emoticons/smile.png
MainMan post=434715 said:Not good for the conference.
18 months from now, Posh walks into the Garden in a UConn uniform. I'd be pretty well dejected.RedStormNC post=434716 said:MainMan post=434715 said:Not good for the conference.
I'd rather keep good players in conference than lose them to others.
Anyone have any insight on how frequent this has happened in the bigger conferences that have allowed it already?
you just had to put that out there in the universe.... that would be a tough one to swallow.... as much as it would hurt, would still side with the player if he thinks a move is best for his career.youMainMan post=434717 said:18 months from now, Posh walks into the Garden in a UConn uniform. I'd be pretty well dejected.RedStormNC post=434716 said:MainMan post=434715 said:Not good for the conference.
I'd rather keep good players in conference than lose them to others.
Anyone have any insight on how frequent this has happened in the bigger conferences that have allowed it already?
Room112 post=434722 said:I have mixed feelings about this. There has seemed to be a real brotherhood among the coaches in the Big East, especially since it went to a 10 team league. I feel like it's actually helped the conference as a whole. Unfortunately, this has the ability to smash a lot of that. It doesn't even have to be a kid transferring, but imagine finding out a coach you thought you were close with is sniffing around for one of your players.