Sounds like Darcy might post here.. is that you jumbo_peanuts??http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/colleges/post/_/id/6313/one-month-in-st-johns-has-long-way-to-go
Sounds like Darcy might post here.. is that you jumbo_peanuts??http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/colleges/post/_/id/6313/one-month-in-st-johns-has-long-way-to-go
Sounds like Darcy might post here.. is that you jumbo_peanuts??http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/colleges/post/_/id/6313/one-month-in-st-johns-has-long-way-to-go
Yeah, that article is nothing more than a thread from this site. I know there is not much else that can be said but every word he wrote has been said a thousand times already.
Sounds like Darcy might post here.. is that you jumbo_peanuts??http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/colleges/post/_/id/6313/one-month-in-st-johns-has-long-way-to-go
Yeah, that article is nothing more than a thread from this site. I know there is not much else that can be said but every word he wrote has been said a thousand times already.
I question how much of the Georgia Tech game he watched or really paid attention to. That second half was not a run against a mediocre team, as he would have his readers believe. That was a significant change in our defensive style vs. what we used up to the point this year, and it worked very well. And we all know it also worked very well three years ago.
That second half was more about us waking up and being aggressive than it was about who we were playing. We showed significant improvement with that style of play. We all want more data points to prove that we can get better with the press, but the signs were certainly there, and the Fordham game will clearly tell us more.
http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/colleges/post/_/id/6313/one-month-in-st-johns-has-long-way-to-go
Sounds like Darcy might post here.. is that you jumbo_peanuts??http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/colleges/post/_/id/6313/one-month-in-st-johns-has-long-way-to-go
Yeah, that article is nothing more than a thread from this site. I know there is not much else that can be said but every word he wrote has been said a thousand times already.
I question how much of the Georgia Tech game he watched or really paid attention to. That second half was not a run against a mediocre team, as he would have his readers believe. That was a significant change in our defensive style vs. what we used up to the point this year, and it worked very well. And we all know it also worked very well three years ago.
That second half was more about us waking up and being aggressive than it was about who we were playing. We showed significant improvement with that style of play. We all want more data points to prove that we can get better with the press, but the signs were certainly there, and the Fordham game will clearly tell us more.
The article is spot on.
The article is spot on.