NIL’s

They really should just cap it. If the whole point was that schools were taking advantage of these kids by using them to generate profit for themselves; then fair pay to the players generating that profit is reasonable. I fully support capitalism, but this has gotten out of hand with kids just shopping themselves around to the highest bidder year over year. They are no longer student athletes if they not invested in at least the illusion of an education.

Pick a number in the hundreds of thousands and let that be the max a school can give per player. It levels the playing field, eliminates this nonsense of kids leveraging one school against another and satisfies the original intent of compensating the kids for their contributions to the revenues they generate. Plus, if a kid can only make the same amount of money regardless of where they play it likely leads to longer term commitments to the teams that invested in their development. And that leads to better basketball and a better experience for the kids playing, the kids in the stands, the universities and us as fans.
Come on guys, they can’t just cap it. Schools colluding to fix prices and markets is a criminal violation of the federal antitrust laws. And on the civil side, players can recover treble damages and legal fees. If it were that simple, it would not be this festering sore. Absent congressional legislation and/or a collective bargaining unit, it will continue to be the Wild West. Even the rumored settlement in the NCAA pending lawsuits will require an act of Congress. Good luck with that.
 
Since these NIL contracts are so large, these players should have to forfeit some money if they don’t perform at a certain level. Minimal expectations in scoring rebounding etc. should be in place for these vastly over paid professionals.
Not that it would ever happen, obviously, but 99% of head coaches would agree with you
 
Since these NIL contracts are so large, these players should have to forfeit some money if they don’t perform at a certain level. Minimal expectations in scoring rebounding etc. should be in place for these vastly over paid professionals.
The only reasonable thing I can think of is to sign a contract that you’re going to stay for 2 years (allow to leave for the NBA). The idea of leaving the following year for more money elsewhere is destroying college basketball. We’ve TOTALLY gotten away with the concept of a “student athlete”!
 
Not that it would ever happen, obviously, but 99% of head coaches would agree with you
And 100% would rebel against the same criteria being put on them. Coaches hypocrisy is a huge factor in creating the cesspool CBB is right now.
Years ago, I asked a D1 coach at a clinic why coaches don’t put a clause in their contracts that their recruits are released from their commitment if the coach leaves? This after he pontificated high and mighty about his “right” to better himself. Needless to say his reply was a 100% non-reply.
 
Last edited:
If I were advising Mitchell, I would suggest he take less money and go play for a coach like Larranaga or Pitino to coach him up. Tear down that shot and build it from a scratch and add a few go-to moves from the FT line extended.

He has all the projectability you could ask for, but the skill set is underwhelming. He could have a 10 year NBA career with some elite coaching and hard work.
Or , he could have a No NBA Career . I understand he can’t hit the broad side of the Barn with his shot …
And , we have often discussed on this Board that Shooting is somewhat a Gift . Kind of like playing the Violin .
You either have a Shot or , you don’t .if shooting could be taught , everyone would be Chris Mullin or Reggie Miller , not to mention Stef Curry .

Plus , isn’t he undersized as well ?
 
Since these NIL contracts are so large, these players should have to forfeit some money if they don’t perform at a certain level. Minimal expectations in scoring rebounding etc. should be in place for these vastly over paid professionals.
You mean like in the MLB, NFL, NBA and NHL? Oh wait, such contracts in those higher paid leagues don’t exist.
 
The only reasonable thing I can think of is to sign a contract that you’re going to stay for 2 years (allow to leave for the NBA). The idea of leaving the following year for more money elsewhere is destroying college basketball. We’ve TOTALLY gotten away with the concept of a “student athlete”!
Coaches don’t want that either in case things don’t work out.
 
I hope all these NIL kids have tough skins cause fans will start treating them as professionals. They can expect to be cheered loudly when they do well and booed loudly when they don’t. The old “they’re just kids” doesn’t hold water anymore.
 
Or , he could have a No NBA Career . I understand he can’t hit the broad side of the Barn with his shot …
And , we have often discussed on this Board that Shooting is somewhat a Gift . Kind of like playing the Violin .
You either have a Shot or , you don’t .if shooting could be taught , everyone would be Chris Mullin or Reggie Miller , not to mention Stef Curry .

Plus , isn’t he undersized as well ?
Shooting is a skill — which by definition can be learned.

Coordination I would classify as a talent which can only be improved slightly.
 
And 100% would rebel against the same criteria being put on them. Coaches hypocrisy is a huge factor in creating the cesspool CBB is right now.
Years ago, I asked a D1 coach at a clinic why coaches don’t put a clause in their contracts that their recruits are released from their commitment if the coach leaves? This after he pontificated high and mighty about his “right” to better himself. Needless to say his reply was a 100% non-reply.
I don’t know how long ago that clinic was but if it was before NIL and one free transfer, such a clause in a coach’s contract would mean nothing. A player had the right to leave in your scenario however unless he was going to be a graduate student, the NCAA rules would still mandate that the player sit out a year as a transfer and there was no waiver process for such a scenario. Such a clause would be null and void.
 
Best idea I heard recently was giving kids a four year guaranteed contract, but then implement something similar to the European soccer leagues where schools need to buy out the contract from the other school before making a new deal. Obviously imperfect, but at least incentivizes more talent into the mid-majors, rewards them for developing talent, etc.

And for high majors, they'll not only get money if they lose a guy but maybe it also makes programs less likely to do it if it costs them a pretty penny.
 
Come on guys, they can’t just cap it. Schools colluding to fix prices and markets is a criminal violation of the federal antitrust laws. And on the civil side, players can recover treble damages and legal fees. If it were that simple, it would not be this festering sore. Absent congressional legislation and/or a collective bargaining unit, it will continue to be the Wild West. Even the rumored settlement in the NCAA pending lawsuits will require an act of Congress. Good luck with that.
Thank you X 100.
 
Best idea I heard recently was giving kids a four year guaranteed contract, but then implement something similar to the European soccer leagues where schools need to buy out the contract from the other school before making a new deal. Obviously imperfect, but at least incentivizes more talent into the mid-majors, rewards them for developing talent, etc.

And for high majors, they'll not only get money if they lose a guy but maybe it also makes programs less likely to do it if it costs them a pretty penny.
Something has to happen and dk's idea is not crazy.
 
Since these NIL contracts are so large, these players should have to forfeit some money if they don’t perform at a certain level. Minimal expectations in scoring rebounding etc. should be in place for these vastly over paid professionals.
What sports contract works like that?

They aren’t supposed to be paid for their performance anyway. It is for their name, image, and likeness — as thinly veiled as that may be.
 
The only reasonable thing I can think of is to sign a contract that you’re going to stay for 2 years (allow to leave for the NBA). The idea of leaving the following year for more money elsewhere is destroying college basketball. We’ve TOTALLY gotten away with the concept of a “student athlete”!

Most of these kids were never students to begin with and now don’t even have to pretend to be.
And the NCAA has not cared for some time. Think about it, when was the last time you heard of a college athlete being ineligible due to poor grades? Let’s see, for me it was about 50 years ago. And colleges are as much to blame as they are more concerned about their bottom line then the future or welfare of any of their athletes.

I never thought I would see the day where college athletics would have sunken lower than that of professional sport franchises.
 
I don’t know how long ago that clinic was but if it was before NIL and one free transfer, such a clause in a coach’s contract would mean nothing. A player had the right to leave in your scenario however unless he was going to be a graduate student, the NCAA rules would still mandate that the player sit out a year as a transfer and there was no waiver process for such a scenario. Such a clause would be null and void.
I understand, I asked it off the cuff and somewhat hypothetically in a conversation largely centering around the bigger picture of the way “student athletes” were considered and treated as anything but by schools. It was in a bar and in no way a “legalistic” conversation, he pontificated, I countered with the question.
Certainly way pre-NIL, I haven’t attended a clinic in decades, probably late 70’s to early 80’s.
 
I'd also say, for the people talking about these players like they're all spoiled and only have upside, the players/student-athletes are all on one year contracts. There's guys who wanted to remain at the school but the coach told them they should enter the portal. No buy-out, no recourse, etc. Imagine if coaches were on one year contracts with no guaranteed money?
 
Back
Top